I will be coming out of my hole soon, but until I do you can find me semi-active on Bluesky.
I mostly post nonsense, but what else would you expect, really?
I will be coming out of my hole soon, but until I do you can find me semi-active on Bluesky.
I mostly post nonsense, but what else would you expect, really?
I’m stuck in a void, and all that’s keeping it tolerable are those of you in here with me.
The last eight years have gone by like eight minutes.
Eight minutes in an oven.
Eight minutes in shark-infested waters.
Eight minutes in the metaphor of our own making.
Next time the minute hand moves, I will know whether the temperature is going up, whether the sharks have lost interest, or whether the other thing that means something else has happened.
Until then I’m going to sleep and dream of better days, and when I wake I shall know whether those dreams were portents or memories.

Look at the picture (if able, or read the description).
<record-scratching>
<beat drops>
<dope lyrics begin>
See, it’s funny because “wrap” and “rap” are homophones.
Or maybe it’s funny because that isn’t my first rum drink today.
Let’s talk about rum.
It’s the first spirit I found a taste for, and these days it’s like an old friend I drop in to check on from time to time.
Our relationship started a loooong time ago, though.
Now, this may surprise you, but for ages — specifically until my 30s — I wasn’t really a drinker at all.
For a good while I even teetotaled, if you can believe it.
However.
Remember that friend I mentioned a couple of days ago? From middle school? Well, funny thing. We both made it to high school and remained friends. Friendly rivals, also, when it came to “who’s best in the band” — which, if you’ve never been part of a high school band a) My regrets, and b) It can be super cutthroat, albeit beneath an almost-Midwestern level of friendliness.
Anyway, one night we were hanging out at his place with his parents away, and he brought out a hidden gem, gifted to him by his uncle: a bottle of Pusser’s Rum.
Now, if you don’t know about Pusser’s Rum, the quick version is: It’s made from the same recipe used by the British Royal Navy for the daily rum ration until they decided — in 1970! — that maaaaybe it wasn’t a good idea to keep handing out a tot of rum to every sailor on the daily, especially given modern sailors spent a bit less time splicing braces and reefing sails than, you know, maintaining nuclear generators.
Pusser’s Rum was never available to the public until after Black Tot Day, when the Royal Navy sold the formula to a private company in exchange for an ongoing contribution to the Royal Navy Sailors’ Fund.
Where was I?
Right. High school.
So my friend brought out the Pusser’s, along with some official Pusser’s Painkiller Mix, and my love of rum was born.
I can still recall the numbering sensation on my lips from that first sip. Magic.1
I’ve since moved on to “more sophisticated” drinking endeavors2 like Scotch whisky, but that’s where it started. With rum. And I still — as evidenced above — enjoy the occasional rum drink.
Now.
You don’t need Painkiller mix, though if you’re going that route, get Pusser’s.
A Painkiller, per the originator, is made thusly:
Mix in a shaker with ice, pour into a swanky glass over crushed ice, garnish with a little umbrella and some fruit, if you’re into that.
Pairs well with wrapping.
Or rapping.
What I’m drinking: Pusser’s Rum. Sort of.
What it’s like: It’s sometimes marketed as a “sipping rum,” and I’ve even seen it referred to as “the single malt of rum.” Part of the charm of Pusser’s — aside from the neat historicals — is its manufacture in wooden pot stills and its aging (for a minimum of three years) in charred oak casks. That’s a lot more trouble than most rum makers go to for their products, and the difference shows in the way you can sip Pusser’s neat like a whisky, which is what I usually do, except when the need for a Painkiller arises, as it does during the holidays.
Today’s toast: To all of us covered in bits of paper and ribbon, wondering where the scissors went and who this just-wrapped present we forgot to label is actually for.
Just checking in? See yesterday’s post for more, specifically more about Bruce Campbell.

Over at his site, John Scalzi is spending December doing his own sort of Wind-down, though he isn’t calling it such. Specifically, he’s writing about a movie each day — a “comfort watch” that he goes back to time and again.
I like the idea. I could maybe pass a month that way myself.
Today, though, I’m instead going to tell you about a Comfort Non-Watch.
So, I’m a big fan of Bruce Campbell, have been ever since a friend of mine in middle school invited me over to his house, which was near a video store, which we went to, where his friend at the register totally ignored the fact that we were well under 18 and rented us Evil Dead.
If you don’t know Evil Dead, I’ll just go ahead and tell you it’s the best low-(almost no)-budget made-in-a-random-cabin-in-Tennessee-by-two-lifelong-friends-then-in-their-twenties-with-a-camera-and-a-dream horror film ever.
The next weekend, my friend and I watched Evil Dead 2, but, like the movie itself, that’s another story.
Anyway, since that fateful underage viewing of Evil Dead, I’ve made an effort to watch most everything Bruce Campbell has been in. It’s the rare case where I follow an actor rather than a writer or director. He’s just damned good, certainly the best B-movie actor of his generation.
There are a few things I’ve missed along the way, though.
I’ve seen most of his films, and most of the TV series he’s been in1, but the gaps, naturally, bug me.
One of those gaps is Running Time, a low-budget, black-and-white heist film from 1997 with a running time of 70 minutes.
I mention the running time because the entire film, in keeping with its title, is presented in real-time and as one continuous take.
Now, I’d heard of this, of course, and it was on my “get to it eventually” list — where it had so much company it would never want for conversation — but I hadn’t gone to the trouble of tracking down a copy of the DVD, which is rare and also the only way to watch the film. (I scoured every streaming service. Nobody has it.)
Then I found out that the role Campbell plays — Carl, the just-released-from-prison thief who gets pulled in for a job — is one of his top five2 favorite roles from his entire career.3
Well, then.
Off to eBay I went, and after some searching and waiting I scored a still-in-the-shrink-wrap copy for less than the cost of a good bottle of whisky.
And it’s been sitting on the shelf since, waiting for its moment, my Comfort Non-Watch, that movie which I am excited to see but hold in reserve for a day when I really need it.
Here’s what I’m drinking today: J.P. Wiser’s 18-Year-Old Canadian Whisky.
What a minute!
Yes, that’s what I was drinking yesterday.
But why?
Well, a few reasons, starting with the fact that I didn’t really feel like cracking into something else this evening and ending with the fact that if I don’t get ahead of The Empress of Whisky I might not get another pour off this bottle.
Will you have something new tomorrow?
Probably not. I’ve got some family holiday shenanigans to get through, which, while they may very well involve whisky, might not leave me with time to write about it.
I’ve decided not to push myself the way I used to when it comes to writing these. I’d like to have one each day, now that I’ve started, but I’m not going to eat that pressure this year.
If I do have whisky this weekend, I’ll take pictures and catch you up later.
Check out yesterday’s post for a story about my dating anniversary, as well as my tasting notes on J.P. Wiser’s 18-Year-Old Canadian Whisky. Or skip ahead to a tale of rum.

That title is not a randomly generated number string.
Bear with me.
17: That’s how many days are left in the year.
The first 18: This refers to the whisky at hand, J.P. Wiser’s 18-Year-Old Blended Canadian Whisky.
The second 18: This refers to the fact that 18 years ago, this gal and I started dating. These days I call her The Empress of Whisky.
Now.
When I used to do this regularly, I’d tell you a bit about the dram, then a bit about why I chose it and whatnot.
So.
To be bloody blunt about it, J.P. Wiser’s 18-Year-Old Blended Canadian Whisky was the most affordable 18-year-old whisky at the bottle shoppe where The Empress and I found ourselves a couple of evenings ago.
18 years is a significant point in whisky, especially Scotch whisky. Not every distillery has an 18-year-old offering, but if they have an offering beyond the common 10, 12, and 15, it’s likely an 18. I’ve had some quite fine ones over the years.
But.
We’re usually talking three figures.
Which, well, I don’t know your economic standing or spending philosophy, but that’s the point where mine says OUCH.
I don’t doubt the quality, necessarily, but I do begin to doubt — What’s that economic term? Oh, “marginal value.” — the marginal value of the drinking experience beyond the three-digit price threshold.
I’m also reminded of a favorite line from a favorite book, which is:
I passed him the bottle and watched as he decanted two careful fingers. Jimmy de Soto had always said it was sacrilege to sink more than five fingers of single malt on any one occasion. After that, he maintained, you might as well be drinking blended.
— Takeshi Kovacs,
narrator of Altered Carbon by Richard K. Morgan
See, at a certain point, you have to ask yourself why you’re drinking: Is it for the fleeting sensations of taste experienced in the moment, or is it for the butterflies and rainbows in your head afterwards?
It’s okay to say both.
Thing is, if you’re spending into the triple digits per bottle, I think you’d better:
a) Really damn appreciate the dram.
AND
b) Just appreciate the dram, singular, not plural.
So.
This is the point where I bring it all together.
We bought this bottle of 18-year-old J.P. Wiser’s Blended Canadian Whiskey for less than a three-digit price.
Which is fine and understandable because:
a) Canadian whisky isn’t Scotch whisky, in terms of price or quality.
AND
b) Blended whisky — even the aged stuff — isn’t single malt, in terms of price or quality.
Nonetheless, for the act of getting out of the bottle shoppe without dropping a hundo, there was much rejoicing.
But there would have been regardless because, as noted above, The Empress and I have been together for 18 years now.
Which, to those who scoff at dating anniversaries, I say: Avert your eyes. Or learn to have fun. Preferably the second.
Yes, we have a wedding anniversary, and, yes, we observe it. But there’s something simple and pure about marking the point each year when we can add up our total years in one and another’s company, appreciate the fact that we continue to appreciate each other, and have a dram.
And the fact that we’re just fine with a sub-$100 dram for the occasion is just one note of the success and maturity of our 18-year-old relationship.
Or, as The Empress herself put it when we filled our glasses tonight: “We’re not just wiser — we’re J.P. Wiser.”
You can see why I love her.
The dram: J.P. Wiser’s Irish Whiskey, aged 18 years.
The drink: Warm and full and malty-sweet in a way that Canadian whisky often isn’t while still incredibly smooth in the way that Canadian whisky always is.
The dream: This is only the first 18 years.
The toast: To love, of course!
New here? Or just not sure what the hell is going on? Check out yesterday’s post for a few answers. And look! Here’s tomorrow’s post! It’s editing magic!